3.8 Article

The Chemical Composition, Antioxidant and Anti-Tyrosinase Activities, and Irritation Properties of Sripanya Punica granatum Peel Extract

期刊

COSMETICS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cosmetics7010007

关键词

Sripanya; Punica granatum; antioxidant; anti-tyrosinase; irritation; HET-CAM

资金

  1. National Research Council of Thailand [P000019871]
  2. Graduate School at Chiang Mai University, Thailand
  3. Faculty of Pharmacy at Chiang Mai University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This is the first study to investigate the effect of ethanol concentrations on the phenolic content and biological activities of Sripanya Punica granatum peel extract. Various concentrations of ethanol, (20 to 80% v/v), were used in the maceration process. Extracts were investigated for total phenolic content by the Folin-Ciocalteu method, antioxidant activities by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) assay, and anti-tyrosinase activity by a spectrophotometric method. The chemical composition was investigated using high-performance liquid chromatography. The irritation of the extracts was determined by Hen's egg test-chorioallantoic membrane assay. The results demonstrated that E60, which was extracted using 60% v/v ethanol, had the highest yield (66.23 +/- 0.38% w/w), the highest total phenolic content (490.42 +/- 7.20 mu g GAE/g), and the highest antioxidant and anti-tyrosinase activities. IC50 values on DPPH center dot and ABTS(center dot+) inhibition were 10.97 +/- 0.97 and 6.48 +/- 0.06 mu g/mL, respectively. The 60% v/v ethanol extract (E60) possessed strong tyrosinase inhibition with an IC50 value of 0.10 +/- 0.13 mu g/mL, which is more potent than kojic acid. The major constituents were punicalagin (4.05 +/- 0.26% w/w) and ellagic acid (0.63 +/- 0.04% w/w). E60 was safe for topical application since it did not induce irritation. Therefore, we suggest that E60 is a promising agent for further product development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据