4.7 Article

Intrinsic Connectivity of Hippocampal Subfields in Normal Elderly and Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 38, 期 10, 页码 4922-4932

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23704

关键词

hippocampal subfields; resting-state functional connectivity; networks; aMCI patients

资金

  1. Association France Alzheimer
  2. Fondation Plan Alzheimer [Alzheimer Plan 2008-2012]
  3. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique [PHRC National 2011]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR LONGVIE 2007]
  5. Region Basse Normandie
  6. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hippocampal connectivity has been widely described but connectivity specificities of hippocampal subfields and their changes in early AD are poorly known. The aim of this study was to highlight hippocampal subfield networks in healthy elderly (HE) and their changes in amnestic patients with mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Thirty-six HE and 27 aMCI patients underwent resting-state functional MRI scans. Specific intrinsic connectivity of bilateral CA1, SUB (subiculum), and CA2/3/4/DG was identified in HE (using seeds derived from manually delineation on high-resolution scans) and compared between HE and aMCI. Compared to the other subfields, CA1 was more strongly connected to the amygdala and occipital regions, CA2/3/4/DG to the left anterior cingulate cortex, temporal, and occipital regions, and SUB to the angular, precuneus, putamen, posterior cingulate, and frontal regions. aMCI patients showed reduced connectivity within the SUB network (with frontal and posterior cingulate regions). Our study highlighted for the first time three specific and distinct hippocampal subfield functional networks in HE, and their alterations in aMCI. These findings are important to understand AD specificities in both cognitive deficits and lesion topography, given the role of functional connectivity in these processes. (C) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据