4.5 Article

Source apportionment of pollution in groundwater source area using factor analysis and positive matrix factorization methods

期刊

HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 1417-1436

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2017.1322894

关键词

source apportionment; groundwater; factor analysis; positive matrix factorization; water source area

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41402211, 41372233]
  2. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China [2014ZX07201-010]
  3. Special Project of Water Pollution Prevention, MEP of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By means of factor analysis (FA) and positive matrix factorization (PMF) methods, groundwater pollution sources were identified in the Jinji groundwater source area, which is beside the Yellow River and is the only urban water supply source for the city of Wuzhong in Northwestern China. The sources of groundwater were quantified based on 16 samples of shallow groundwater from the source area. The source apportionment with the PMF model identified three dominant groundwater pollution sources. These were anthropogenic activities of agricultural and industrial pollution with a pollution contribution of 53.0%, water-rock interaction of 24.6%, and evaporation and concentration of 22.4%. The source apportionment with the FA model identified four sources which were evaporation and concentration, with the largest contribution (42.6%), followed by anthropogenic activities (29.2%), mineral dissolution and industrial pollution (22.4%), and natural effects (5.8%). Specific attention should be paid to these natural (fluoride, TH, etc.) and anthropogenic sources (NH4+, NO2-, turbidity, total bacterial count, etc.), and pertinent measures should be taken to control local groundwater pollution. The most significant trait of the PMF is its scientific interpretation and physical explanation of the results, depending on non-negative restriction of the pollution source profiles and contributions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据