3.8 Proceedings Paper

Above-ground carbon stock estimates of rubber (hevea brasiliensis) using Sentinel 2A imagery: a case study in rubber plantation of PTPN IX Kebun Getas and Kebun Ngobo, Semarang Regency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon stock estimates are very important to support carbon policies at the regional level and sustainable environmental management. Rubber plantation is one of the carbon-absorbing ecosystems, due to its long life and large biomass content. The aim of this study was to estimate the above-ground carbon stock based on Sentinel 2A remotely sensed imagery, through vegetation index approaches. In the initial stage, the image was corrected radiometrically to obtain a bottom of atmosphere (BoA) reflectance values, so that all spectral indices that were run could provide reliable results. The vegetation indices used in this study were RVI (Ratio Vegetation Index), NDVI (Normalised Difference Vegetation Index), ARVI (Atmospheric Resistant Vegetation Index), and SARVI (Soil and Atmospherically Resistant Vegetation Index). The values generated from those indices were correlated with field data of carbon stock, which was derived from breast height diameter (BHD)-based biomass measurements and allometric equations. Correlation and regression analyses of carbon stock and vegetation indices were then used to interpolate the samples to the entire study area, using exponential, logarithmic, and quadratic equations. The resultant above ground carbon stock maps were then tested for accuracy assessment using field data collected independently. It was found that the ARVI-based estimation model with BoA reflectance radiometric correction, combined with exponential regression equation, showed the best accuracy values of 84.48% (supported by r2 = 0.473). Based on this model, the above-ground carbon stock estimate in Ngobo and Getas Plantation, PTPN IX were 527,072.39 tons in an area of 2,656,615 hectares, or 198.4 tons/hectares.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据