4.6 Article

Numerical investigation of jet impingement flows with different nanofluids in a mini channel using Eulerian-Eulerian two-phase method

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2020.100585

关键词

Cu-water nanofluid; Jet impingement; Nusselt number; Eulerian-Eulerian two-phase method; Nusselt number correlation; Mini channel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An in-house Fortran based two-phase Eulerian-Eulerian solver is used to numerically study an incompressible confined slot jet impinging with nanofluid on an iso-thermal hot flat surface of a mini channel in the laminar regime. The governing equations of liquid and solid phases are solved using finite difference method. Heat transfer performance of water-based nanofluid with different nanoparticles such as Al2O3, SiO2, Cu, Fe, diamond and Ag is studied. Heat transfer performance of nanofluids cannot be predicted solely from the thermal conductivity values of suspended nanoparticles as observed that Al2O3 water nanofluid shows better performance than iron-water nanofluid. Since the iron-water nanofluid has only 5% more average Nusselt number but 7% more pressure drop compared to Al2O3-water nanofluid for jet Reynolds number 300 and particle concentration 5%. Heat transfer performance of Cu-water nanofluid is studied and reported for different parameters such as jet Reynolds number, particle concentration and channel height to jet width ratios. Results show a significant change in heat transfer characteristics with respect to jet Reynolds number, particle concentration, and height to jet width ratio. The heat transfer enhancement is 25% for Al2O3 water nanofluid and 60% for Cu-water nanofluid compared to pure water at jet Reynolds number 300 and particle concentration 5%. An empirical correlation is developed to predict the average Nusselt number of the jet flow with Cu-water nanofluid impinging on a hot surface. Present results are validated with numerical and experimental results available in the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据