4.0 Article

A video protocol for rapid dissection of mouse dorsal root ganglia from defined spinal levels

期刊

BMC RESEARCH NOTES
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-020-05147-6

关键词

Afferent nerve; Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT); Comparative anatomy; Neuroanatomy; Nociception; Pain; Peripheral nerve; Peripheral neuropathy; Sensory neuron; Spinal cord

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/S006990/1]
  2. Wellcome Trust [107116/Z/15/Z]
  3. European Union [739572]
  4. UK Dementia Research Institute Foundation [UKDRI-1005]
  5. MRC [UKDRI-1005, MR/S006990/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are heterogeneous assemblies of assorted sensory neuron cell bodies found in bilateral pairs at every level of the spinal column. Pseudounipolar afferent neurons convert external stimuli from the environment into electrical signals that are retrogradely transmitted to the spinal cord dorsal horn. To do this, they extend single axons from their DRG-resident somas that then bifurcate and project both centrally and distally. DRG can be dissected from mice at embryonic stages and any age post-natally, and have been extensively used to study sensory neuron development and function, response to injury, and pathological processes in acquired and genetic diseases. We have previously published a step-by-step dissection method for the rapid isolation of post-natal mouse DRG. Here, the objective is to extend the protocol by providing training videos that showcase the dissection in fine detail and permit the extraction of ganglia from defined spinal levels. Results By following this method, the reader will be able to swiftly and accurately isolate specific lumbar, thoracic, and cervical DRG from mice. Dissected ganglia can then be used for RNA/protein analyses, subjected to immunohistochemical examination, and cultured as explants or dissociated primary neurons, for in-depth investigations of sensory neuron biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据