4.6 Article

The utilization of Fe-doped g-C3N4in a heterogeneous photo-Fenton-like catalytic system: the effect of different parameters and a system mechanism investigation

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 10, 期 37, 页码 21876-21886

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ra00993h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21367003]
  2. Guangxi Major Project Science and Technology [AA17129001]
  3. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Clean Pulp & Papermaking and Pollution Control Open Foundation [KF201724]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a series of Fe-doped g-C3N4(Fe-C3N4) samples was synthesized and characterizedviaX-ray powder diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), UV-vis diffuse reflection spectroscopy (UV-vis DRS), and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. The photocatalytic activity of the synthesized Fe-C(3)N(4)was investigated toward methylene blue (MB) degradation with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) assistance. The results showed that the Fe-C(3)N(4)heterogeneous photo-Fenton-like system showed excellent catalytic performance when the pH value was varied from 3.0 to 9.0. Evaluating the effects of various inorganic anions in the Fe-C(3)N(4)heterogeneous photo-Fenton-like system, HCO(3)(-)showed a dual effect on MB degradation, and Cl(-)and NO(3)(-)showed an inhibitory effect on MB degradation. Evaluating the effects of inorganic cations, Al3+, Mg2+, and Ca(2+)strongly inhibited MB degradation. Recycling experiments demonstrated that Fe-C(3)N(4)possesses good reusability and stability. Quenching experiments were carried out, and it was found that hydroxyl radicals (center dot OH) were the primary active species in the system. Besides, nine intermediates were identifiedviaLC/MS, and a possible MB degradation pathway in the system was proposed. This study could promote the application of this Fe-C(3)N(4)heterogeneous photo-Fenton-like system in realistic dye wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据