4.6 Article

Conductive conduit small gap tubulization for peripheral nerve repair

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 10, 期 28, 页码 16769-16775

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ra02143a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Major R&D Program of National Ministry of Science and Technology [2018YFB1105504]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [11672002, 31771322, 31571235, 31571236]
  3. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission Science and Technology Nova Cross Project [2018019]
  4. Ministry of Education Innovation Program of China [IRT16R01, IRT1201]
  5. Key Laboratory of Trauma and Nerve Regeneration, Ministry of Education
  6. National Center for Trauma Medicine, Peking University Medicine Seed Fund for Interdisciplinary Research
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [BMU2018ME003]
  8. Chinese National Ministry of Science and Technology 973 Project [2014CB542201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite advances in surgical techniques, functional recovery following epineurial neurorrhaphy of transected peripheral nerves often remains quite unsatisfactory. Small gap tubulisation is a promising approach that has shown potential to traditional epineurial neurorrhaphy in the treatment of peripheral nerve injury. Thus, the goal of this study is to evaluate sciatic nerve regeneration after nerve transection, followed by small gap tubulization using a reduced graphene oxide-based conductive conduit.In vitro, the electrically conductive conduit could promote Schwann cell proliferation through PI3K/Akt signaling pathway activation.In vivo, the results of electrophysiological and walking track analysis suggest that the electrically conductive conduit could promote sensory and motor nerve regeneration and functional recovery, which is based on the mechanisms of selective regeneration and multiple-bud regeneration. These promising results illustrate electrically conductive conduit small gap tubulization as an alternative approach for transected peripheral nerve repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据