4.5 Article

History-driven population structure and asymmetric gene flow in a recovering large carnivore at the rear-edge of its European range

期刊

HEREDITY
卷 120, 期 2, 页码 168-182

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41437-017-0031-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. NGO ARCTUROS
  2. Hellenic Ministry of Rural Development and Food
  3. Egnatia S.A.
  4. Vodafone Greece
  5. Vodafone Group Foundation
  6. MHIRT grant
  7. Danish Natural Science Research Council [1337-00007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the mechanisms and patterns involved in population recoveries is challenging and important in shaping conservation strategies. We used a recovering rear-edge population of brown bears at their southernmost European range in Greece as a case study (2007-2010) to explore the recovery genetics at a species' distribution edge. We used 17 microsatellite and a mitochondrial markers to evaluate genetic structure, estimate effective population size and genetic diversity, and infer gene flow between the identified subpopulations. To understand the larger picture, we also compared the observed genetic diversity of each subpopulation with other brown bear populations in the region. The results indicate that the levels of genetic diversity for bears in western Greece are the lowest recorded in southeastern Europe, but still higher than those of other genetically depauperate bear populations. Apart from a complete separation of bear populations in eastern and western Greece, our results also indicate a considerable genetic sub-structuring in the West. As bear populations in Greece are now recovering, this structure is dissolving through a recovery cascade of asymmetric gene flow from South to North between neighboring subpopulations, mediated mainly by males. Our study outlines the importance of small, persisting populations, which can act as stepping stones that enable a rapid population expansion and recovery. This in turn makes their importance much greater than their numeric or genetic contribution to a species as a whole.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据