4.8 Article

Argininosuccinate Synthase 1 (ASS1): A Marker of Unclassified Hepatocellular Adenoma and High Bleeding Risk

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 66, 期 6, 页码 2016-2028

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hep.29336

关键词

-

资金

  1. Inca [PLBIO15-135]
  2. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  3. SIRIC BRIO
  4. La Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer
  5. Equipe Labellisee
  6. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer
  7. [ANR-13-JJC-JSV1-0005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are rare benign tumors divided into three main subgroups defined by pathomolecular features, HNF1A (H-HCA), mutated beta-catenin (b-HCA), and inflammatory (IHCA). In the case of unclassified HCAs (UHCAs), which are currently identified by default, a high risk of bleeding remains a clinical issue. The objective of this study was to explore UHCA proteome with the aim to identify specific biomarkers. Following dissection of the tumoral (T) and nontumoral (NT) tissue on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded HCA tissue sections using laser capture methodology, we performed mass spectrometry analysis to compare T and NT protein expression levels in H-HCA, IHCA, b-HCA, UHCA, and focal nodular hyperplasia. Using this methodology, we searched for proteins which are specifically deregulated in UHCA. We demonstrate that proteomic profiles allow for discriminating known HCA subtypes through identification of classical biomarkers in each HCA subgroup. We observed specific up-regulation of the arginine synthesis pathway associated with overexpression of argininosuccinate synthase (ASS1) and arginosuccinate lyase in UHCA. ASS1 immunohistochemistry identified all the UHCA, of which 64.7% presented clinical bleeding manifestations. Interestingly, we demonstrated that the significance of ASS1 was not restricted to UHCA, but also encompassed certain hemorrhagic cases in other HCA subtypes, particularly IHCA. Conclusion: ASS1 1 HCA combined with a typical hematoxylin and eosin stain aspect defined a new HCA subgroup at a high risk of bleeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据