3.8 Proceedings Paper

Low energy cross section of 18O(p,γ)19F

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1668/1/012002

关键词

-

资金

  1. INFN
  2. Gran Sasso National Laboratory
  3. University of Naples/Compagnia di San Paolo grant STAR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The observation of oxygen isotopes in giant stars sheds light on mixing processes operating in their interiors. Due to the very strong correlation between nuclear burning and mixing processes it is very important to reduce the uncertainty on the cross sections of the nuclear reactions that are involved. In this paper we focus our attention on the reaction O-18(p,gamma)F-19. While the O-18(p, alpha)N-15 channel is thought to be dominant, the (p,gamma) channel can still be an important component in stellar burning in giants, depending on the low energy cross section. So far only extrapolations from higher-energy measurements exist and recent estimates vary by orders of magnitude. These large uncertainties call for an experimental reinvestigation of this reaction. We present a direct measurement of the O-18(p,gamma)F-19 cross section using a high-fficiency 4 pi BGO summing detector at the Laboratory for Underground Nuclear Astrophysics (LUNA). The reaction cross section has been directly determined for the first time from 140 keV down to 85 keV and the different cross section components have been obtained individually. The previously highly uncertain strength of the 90 keV resonance was found to be three orders of magnitude lower than an indirect estimate based on nuclear properties of the resonant state and a factor of 20 lower than a recently established upper limit. This result excludes the possibility that the 90 keV resonance can contribute significantly to the stellar reaction rate. In addition the strengths and branching ratios of resonances between 150 and 400 keV have been determined with much improved precision and sensitivity using a HPGe detector, including a first measurement of branching ratios of the 216 keV resonance. Preliminary results are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据