4.7 Review

Remediation of arsenic-contaminated water using agricultural wastes as biosorbents

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10643389.2015.1109910

关键词

Arsenic removal; biosorption; drinking water; iron oxides; water filter; industrial solid waste

资金

  1. Grand Challenges Canada-Stars in Global Health (GCC) [S5 0433-01]
  2. Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan
  3. Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE), Australia
  4. University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, Adelaide, South Australia
  5. National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ010923]
  6. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [PJ010923032016] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arsenic (As) contamination of groundwater reservoirs is a global environmental and health issue given to its toxic and carcinogenic nature. Over 170 million people have been affected by As due to the ingestion of As-contaminated groundwater. Conventional methods such as reverse osmosis, ion exchange, and electrodialysis are commonly used for the remediation of As-contaminated water; however, the high cost and sludge production put limitations on their application to remove As from water. This review critically addresses the use of various agricultural waste materials (e.g., sugarcane bagasse, peels of various fruits, wheat straw) as biosorbents, thereby offering an eco-friendly and low-cost solution for the removal of As from contaminated water supplies. The effect of solution chemistry such as solution pH, cations, anions, organic ligands, and various other factors (e.g., temperature, contact time, sorbent dose) on As biosorption, and safe disposal methods for As-loaded biosorbents to reduce secondary As contamination are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据