3.8 Review

Understanding superiority, noninferiority, and equivalence for clinical trials

期刊

INDIAN DERMATOLOGY ONLINE JOURNAL
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 890-894

出版社

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_130_20

关键词

Clinical trials; equivalence; methodology; noninferiority; superiority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Randomized control trialsare the gold standard for testing the efficacy of new interventions. Historically, superiority trials were methods of choice as reference (standard) interventions were not established for many disease conditions. However currently, reference interventions are available for most of adverse conditions. Despite this, many investigators are using superiority trials in comparison to more suitable noninferiority and equivalence trials. The application of noninferiority and equivalence trials is on the rise, but by and large, these trials are poorly understood, ill-conceived, inappropriately analyzed, and reported and misinterpreted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据