4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Numerical Investigation on the Two Phase Flow Behaviors in Supercritical Water Fluidized Bed with Swirling Flow Distributor

期刊

HEAT TRANSFER ENGINEERING
卷 39, 期 17-18, 页码 1593-1604

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01457632.2017.1370314

关键词

-

资金

  1. China National Key Research and Development Plan Project [2016YFB0600100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776169, 51323011]
  3. Shaanxi Science & Technology Co-ordination & Innovation Project [2015TZC-G-1-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supercritical water fluidized bed reactor is a promising in the clean and efficient conversion of coal, and the distributor is one of the key component for the heat and mass transfer enhancement. However, the optimization study for the distributor in supercritical water fluidized bed reactor has been seldom conducted due to the special thermal properties of supercritical water. In this work, the swirling flow distributor was designed for its optimization for heat and mass transfer inside a supercritical water fluidized bed reactor. The swirling flow can be generated by the concentric circle or triangle type hole distribution in distributor with 0 or 45 degrees intersection angle between the fluid inlet velocity direction and the distributor plane. The computational particle fluid dynamics (SCWFB) method, which has quick calculating speed and high accuracy, was used in this work to study the particle-fluid two-phase flow behaviors inside SCWFB with swirling flow distributors. Investigations were made to reveal the influence of the hole distribution type and intersection angle on the bed pressure drop and particle volume fraction characteristics. The results showed that the triangle type distributor with 45 degrees intersection angle has the best fluidization performance. The conclusions drawn may has potential application for continuous and stable operation of supercritical water fluidized bed reactor for coal gasification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据