4.4 Review

The Tpeak - Tend interval as an electrocardiographic risk marker of arrhythmic and mortality outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

HEART RHYTHM
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 1131-1137

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.031

关键词

T-peak - T-end; Dispersion of repolarization; Risk stratification; Ventricular arrhythmia; Sudden cardiac death

资金

  1. Croucher Foundation of Hong Kong

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The T-peak - T-end interval (the interval from the peak to the end of the T wave), an electrocardiographic marker reflecting transmural dispersion of repolarization, has been used to predict ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) and sudden cardiac death in different clinical settings. OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the significance of the Tpeak 2 Tend interval in predicting arrhythmic and/or mortality end points. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL Plus databases were searched through November 30, 2016. RESULTS Of the 854 studies identified initially, 33 observational studies involving 155,856 patients were included in our meta-analysis. T-peak - T-end interval prolongation (mean cutoff value 103.3 +/- 17.4 ms) was a significant predictor of the arrhythmic or mortality outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.17; P < .001).When different end points were analyzed, the ORs were as follows: VT/VF, 1.10 (95% CI 1.06-1.13; P < .0001); sudden cardiac death, 1.27 (95% CI 1.17-1.39; P < .0001); cardiovascular death, 1.40 (95% CI 1.19-1.64; P < .0001); and all-cause mortality, 4.56 (95% CI 0.62-33.68; P < .0001). Subgroup analysis for each disease revealed that the risk of VT/VF or death was highest for Brugada syndrome (OR 5.68; 95% CI 1.57-20.53; P < .01), fol-lowed by hypertension (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.26-1.85; P,.0001), heart failure (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04-1.11; P < .0001), and ischemic heart disease (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.02-1.10; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION The T-peak - T-end interval is a useful risk stratification tool in different diseases and in the general population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据