4.0 Article

Increasing accuracy of HLA imputation by a population-specific reference panel in a FinnGen biobank cohort

期刊

NAR GENOMICS AND BIOINFORMATICS
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqaa030

关键词

-

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [288393]
  2. Finnish Cancer Fund
  3. Business Finland [3982/31/2013]
  4. Government of Finland
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [288393, 288393] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The HLA genes, the most polymorphic genes in the human genome, constitute the strongest single genetic susceptibility factor for autoimmune diseases, transplantation alloimmunity and infections. HLA imputation via statistical inference of alleles based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with alleles is a powerful first-step screening tool. Due to different LD structures between populations, the accuracy of HLA imputation may benefit from matching the imputation reference with the study population. To evaluate the potential advantage of using population-specific reference in HLA imputation, we constructed an HLA reference panel consisting of 1150 Finns with 5365 major histocompatibility complex region SNPs consistent between genome builds. We evaluated the accuracy of the panel against a European panel in an independent test set of 213 Finnish subjects. We show that the Finnish panel yields a lower imputation error rate (1.24% versus 1.79%). More than 30% of imputation errors occurred in haplotypes enriched in Finland. The frequencies of imputed HLA alleles were highly correlated with clinical-grade HLA allele frequencies and allowed accurate replication of established HLA-disease associations in similar to 102 000 biobank participants. The results show that a population-specific reference increases imputation accuracy in a relatively isolated population within Europe and can be successfully applied to biobank-scale genome data collections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据