4.1 Article

Impact of an acute heat shock during in vitro maturation on interleukin 6 and its associated receptor component transcripts in bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes

期刊

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

BRAZILIAN COLL ANIMAL REPRODUCTION
DOI: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2020-0221

关键词

cumulus-oocyte complex; heat shock; Interleukin 6; oocyte maturation; progesterone

资金

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2016-67015-24899]
  2. state of Tennessee through UT AgResearch
  3. East Tennessee Research and Education Center
  4. Department of Animal Science
  5. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Project [1015707, 1022068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An acute heat stress event after the LH surge increased interleukin 6 (IL6) levels in the follicular fluid of the ovulatory follicle in hyperthermic cows. To examine direct consequences of a physiologically-relevant elevated temperature (41.0 degrees C) on the cumulus-oocyte complex (COC), IL6 transcript abundance and related receptor components were evaluated throughout in vitro maturation. Heat-induced increases in IL6 were first noted at 4 hours of in vitro maturation (hIVM); peak levels occurred at 4.67 versus 6.44 hIVM for 41.0 and 38.5 degrees C COCs, respectively (SEM = 0.23; P < 0.001). Peak IL6ST levels occurred at 6.95 versus 8.29 hIVM for 41.0 and 38.5 degrees C, respectively (SEM = 0.23; P < 0.01). Transcript for LIF differed over time (P < 0.0001) but was not affected by 41.0 degrees C exposure. Blastocyst development after performing IVF was not affected by 41.0 degrees C exposure for 4 or 6 h. When limiting analysis to when IL6 was temporally produced, progesterone levels were only impacted by time and temperature (no interaction). Heat-induced shift in the temporal production of IL6 and IL6ST along with its impact on progesterone likely cooperate in heat-induced hastening of meiotic progression described by others.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据