4.4 Review

The mechanisms of air pollution and particulate matter in cardiovascular diseases

期刊

HEART FAILURE REVIEWS
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 337-347

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10741-017-9606-7

关键词

Air pollution; Particulatematter; Acute cardiovascular diseases; Chronic cardiovascular diseases; Oxidative stress

资金

  1. BBEYONDSILOS, FP7-ICT-PCP
  2. Campania Bioscience [PON03PE_00060_8]
  3. PRIN [2015EASE8Z_003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical and epidemiological studies demonstrate that short- and long-term exposure to air pollution increases mortality due to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Given the increased industrialization and the increased sources of pollutants (i.e., cars exhaust emissions, cigarette smoke, industry emissions, burning of fossil fuels, incineration of garbage), air pollution has become a key public health issue to solve. Among pollutants, the particulate matter (PM) is a mixture of solid and liquid particles which differently affects human health depending on their size (i.e., PM10 with a diameter < 10 mu m reach the lung and PM2.5 with a diameter < 2.5 mu m penetrate deeper into the lung). In particular, the acute exposure to PM10 and PM2.5 increases the rate of cardiovascular deaths. Thus, appropriate interventions to reduce air pollution may promote great benefits to public health by reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Several biological mechanisms have been identified to date which could be responsible for PM-dependent adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Indeed, the exposure to PM10 and PM2.5 induces sustained oxidative stress and inflammation. PM2.5 is also able to increase autonomic nervous system activation. Some potential therapeutic approaches have been tested both in pre-clinical and clinical studies, based on the intake of antioxidants from dietary or by pharmacological administration. Studies are still in progress to increase the knowledge of PM activation of intracellular pathways and propose new strategies of intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据