4.8 Article

Biochar from vegetable wastes: agro-environmental characterization

期刊

BIOCHAR
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 439-453

出版社

SPRINGER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s42773-020-00069-9

关键词

Food waste; Kitchen waste; Pyrolysis; Biochar properties; Soil amendment; Particle size

资金

  1. Qatar National Research Fund [NPRP11S-0117-180328]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Considering the global issue of vegetable wastes generation and its impact on the environment and resources, this study evaluated the conversion of four largely produced vegetable wastes (cauliflower, cabbage, banana peels and corn cob residues) into biochar. Each waste was tested individually and as a combined blend to assess feedstock influences on biochar properties. In addition, various pyrolysis temperatures ranging from 300 degrees C to 600 degrees C and two particle size fractions (less than 75 mu m, 75-125 mu m) were considered. Biochars were characterized for various properties that can influence the biochars' effectiveness as a soil amendment. It was found that pyrolysis temperature was the most dominant factor on biochar properties, but that individual feedstocks produced biochars with different characteristics. The biochars had characteristics that varied as follows: pH 7.2-11.6, ECE 0.15-1.00 mS cm(-1), CEC 17-cmol(c) kg(-1) and zeta -potential - 0.24 to - 43 mV. Based on optimal values of these parameters from the literature, cauliflower and banana peels were determined to be the best feedstocks, though mixed vegetable waste also produced good characteristics. The optimum temperature for pyrolysis was around 400 degrees C, but differed slightly (300-500 degrees C) depending on the distinct feedstock. However, smaller particle size of biochar application was always optimal. Biochar yields were in the range of 20-30% at this temperature range, except for corn cobs which were higher. This study demonstrates that pyrolysis of dried vegetable wastes is a suitable waste valorization approach to produce biochar with good agricultural properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据