4.5 Article

Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy: Past findings and future studies

期刊

HEARING RESEARCH
卷 349, 期 -, 页码 148-154

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.12.008

关键词

Hearing loss; Molecular approach; Preclinical model; Spiral ganglion; Synaptic loss

资金

  1. National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders [R01 DC011793]
  2. Emilie and Phil Schepps Professorship in Hearing Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For decades, we have presumed the death of hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons are the main cause of hearing loss and difficulties understanding speech in noise, but new findings suggest synapse loss may be the key contributor. Specifically, recent preclinical studies suggest that the synapses between inner hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons with low spontaneous rates and high thresholds are the most vulnerable subcellular structures, with respect to insults during aging and noise exposure. This cochlear synaptopathy can be hidden because this synaptic loss can occur without permanent hearing threshold shifts. This new discovery of synaptic loss opens doors to new research directions. Here, we review a number of recent studies and make suggestions in two critical future research directions. First, based on solid evidence of cochlear synaptopathy in animal models, it is time to apply molecular approaches to identify the underlying molecular mechanisms; improved understanding is necessary for developing rational, effective therapies against this cochlear synaptopathy. Second, in human studies, the data supporting cochlear synaptopathy are indirect although rapid progress has been made. To fully identify changes in function that are directly related this hidden synaptic damage, we argue that a battery of tests including both electrophysiological and behavior tests should be combined for diagnosis of hidden hearing loss in clinical studies. This new approach may provide a direct link between cochlear synaptopathy and perceptual difficulties. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据