4.5 Article

Vagally-Mediated Heart Rate Variability and Indices of Well-Being: Results of a Nationally Representative Study

期刊

HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 73-81

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/hea0000397

关键词

heart rate variability; cardiac parasympathetic regulation; emotion regulation; well-being

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [P01-AG020166]
  2. General Clinical Research Centers Program [M01-RR023942, M01-RR00865]
  3. Clinical and Translational Science Award program of the National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health [1UL1RR025011]
  4. Nathaniel Wharton Fund
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR023942, UL1RR025011, M01RR000865] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL063872] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG018436, P01AG020166, U19AG051426] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: High frequency (HF) heart rate variability (HRV) has long been accepted as an index of cardiac vagal control. Recent studies report relationships between HF-HRV and indices of positive and negative affect, personality traits and well-being but these studies generally are based on small and selective samples. Method: These relationships were examined using data from 967 participants in the second Midlife in the U.S. (MIDUS II) study. Participants completed survey questionnaires on well-being and affect. HF-HRV was measured at rest. A hierarchical series of regression analyses examined relationships between these various indices and HF-HRV before and after adjustment for relevant demographic and biomedical factors. Results: Significant inverse relationships were found only between indices of negative affect and HF-HRV. Relationships between indices of psychological and hedonic well-being and positive affect failed to reach significance. Conclusions: These findings raise questions about relationships between cardiac parasympathetic modulation, emotion regulation, and indices of well-being.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据