4.6 Article

Nutrient ratios influence variability in Pseudo-nitzschia species diversity and particulate domoic acid production in the Bay of Seine (France)

期刊

HARMFUL ALGAE
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 192-205

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2017.07.005

关键词

Pseudo-nilzschia; Species diversity; Domoic acid; English channel; Bloom dynamics; Nutrient ratios

资金

  1. TAPAS (Agence de l'eau Seine Normandie - Fonds Europeens pour la Peche) programme
  2. FLAM (Agence de l'eau Seine Normandie - programme LITEAU, Ministere de l'Environnement, de l'Energie et de la Mer) programme
  3. Ministere de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement Superieur

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The population dynamics of different Pseudo-nitzschia species, along with particulate domoic acid (pDA) concentrations, were studied from May 2012 to December 2013 in the Bay of Seine (English Channel, Normandy). While Pseudo-nitzschia spp. blooms occurred during the two years of study, Pseudo-nitzschia species diversity and particulate domoic acid concentrations varied greatly. In 2012, three different species were identified during the spring bloom (P. australis, P. pungens and P. fraudulenta) with high pDA concentrations (similar to 1400 ngl(-1)) resulting in shellfish harvesting closures. In contrast, the 2013 spring was characterised by a P. delicatissima bloom without any toxic event. Above all, the results show that high pDA concentrations coincided with the presence of P. australis and with potential silicate limitation (Si: N < 1), while nitrate concentrations were still replete. The contrasting environmental conditions between 2012 and 2013 highlight different environmental controls that might favour the development of either P. delicatissima or P. australis. This study points to the key role of Pseudo-nitzschia diversity and cellular toxicity in the control of particulate domoic acid variations and highlights the fact that diversity and toxicity are influenced by nutrients, especially nutrient ratios. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据