4.6 Article

Life-history stages of natural bloom populations and the bloom dynamics of a tropical Asian ribotype of Alexandrium minuturn

期刊

HARMFUL ALGAE
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 52-63

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2017.10.006

关键词

HAB dynamics; Paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP); Planozygote; Resting cyst; Saxitoxin

资金

  1. Malaysian government through the Ministry of Higher Education under HICoE Fund [IOES-2014C]
  2. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation [04-01-03-SF1011]
  3. JSPS Core-to-Core Program
  4. Ministry of Higher Education MyBrain Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 2015, a remarkably high density bloom of Alexandrium minutum occurred in Sungai Geting, a semi enclosed lagoon situated in the northeast of Peninsular Malaysia, causing severe discoloration and contaminated the benthic clams (Polymesoda). Plankton and water samples were collected to investigate the mechanisms of bloom development of this toxic species. Analysis of bloom samples using flow cytometry indicated that the bloom was initiated by the process of active excystment, as planomycetes (>4C cells) were observed in the early stage of the bloom. Increase in planozygotes (2C cells) was evident during the middle stage of the bloom, coinciding with an abrupt decrease in salinity and increase of temperature. The bloom was sustained through the combination of binary division of vegetative cells, division of planozygotes, and cyst germination through continuous excystment. Nutrient depletion followed by precipitation subsequently caused the bloom to terminate. This study provides the first continuous record of in situ life-cycle stages of a natural bloom population of A. minutum through a complete bloom cycle. The event has provided a fundamental understanding of the pelagic life-cycle stages of this tropical dinoflagellate, and demonstrated a unique bloom development characteristic shared among toxic Alexandrium species in coastal embayments. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据