3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Parameterized Approximation Scheme for Min k-Cut

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/FOCS46700.2020.00079

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States -Israel Binational Science Foundation [2018302]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [819416]
  3. Swarnajayanti Fellowship [DST/SJF/MSA01/2017-18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the MIN k-CUT problem, input is an edge weighted graph G and an integer k, and the task is to partition the vertex set into k non-empty sets, such that the total weight of the edges with endpoints in different parts is minimized. When k is part of the input, the problem is NP-complete and hard to approximate within any factor less than 2. Recently, the problem has received significant attention from the perspective of parameterized approximation. Gupta et al. [SODA 2018] initiated the study of FPT-approximation for the MIN k-CUT problem and gave an 1.9997-approximation algorithm running in time 2(O(k6)) n(O(1)). Later, the same set of authors [FOCS 2018] designed an (1+epsilon)-approximation algorithm that runs in time (k/epsilon)(O(k))n(k+O(1)), and a 1.81-approximation algorithm running in time 2(O(k2)) n(O(1)). More, recently, Kawarabayashi and Lin [SODA 2020] gave a (5/3 + epsilon)-approximation for MIN k-CUT running in time 2(O(k2 log k)) n(O(1)). In this paper we give a parameterized approximation algorithm with best possible approximation guarantee, and best possible running time dependence on said guarantee (up to Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) and constants in the exponent). In particular, for every epsilon > 0, the algorithm obtains a (1 + epsilon)-approximate solution in time (k/epsilon)(O(k))n(O(1)). The main ingredients of our algorithm are: a simple sparsification procedure, a new polynomial time algorithm for decomposing a graph into highly connected parts, and a new exact algorithm with running time s(O(k))n(O(1)) on unweighted (multi-) graphs. Here, s denotes the number of edges in a minimum k-cut. The latter two are of independent interest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据