4.5 Article

Geometry and the organizational principle of spine synapses along a dendrite

期刊

ENEURO
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0248-20.2020

关键词

Dendritic spine; Electron microscopy; FIB; SEM; Glutamate uncaging; Postsynaptic density; Simulation

资金

  1. JSPS [20H00481, 18K14842]
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [JP20gm1310003, JP20gm5010003]
  3. UTokyo Center for Integrative Science of Human Behavior (CiSHuB)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H00481, 18K14842] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Precise information on synapse organization in a dendrite is crucial to understanding the mechanisms underlying voltage integration and the variability in the strength of synaptic inputs across dendrites of different complex morphologies. Here, we used focused ion beam/scanning electron microscope (FIB/SEM) to image the dendritic spines of mice in the hippocampal CA1 region, CA3 region, somatosensory cortex, striatum, and cerebellum (CB). Our results show that the spine geometry and dimensions differ across neuronal cell types. Despite this difference, dendritic spines were organized in an orchestrated manner such that the postsynaptic density (PSD) area per unit length of dendrite scaled positively with the dendritic diameter in CA1 proximal stratum radiatum (PSR), cortex and CB. The ratio of the PSD area to neck length was kept relatively uniform across dendrites of different diameters in CA1 PSR. Computer simulation suggests that a similar level of synaptic strength across different dendrites in CA1 PSR enables the effective transfer of synaptic inputs from the dendrites towards soma. Excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs), evoked at single spines by glutamate uncaging and recorded at the soma, show that the neck length is more influential than head width in regulating the EPSP magnitude at the soma. Our study describes thorough morphological features and the organizational principles of dendritic spines in different brain regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据