4.3 Article

Safety and dose-dependency of eptacog beta (activated) in a dose escalation study of non-bleeding congenital haemophilia A or B patients, with or without inhibitors

期刊

HAEMOPHILIA
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 844-851

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hae.13357

关键词

bypassing agents; eptacog beta; inhibitors; Phase Ib; recombinant activated factor VII; rhFVIIa

资金

  1. LFB USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IntroductionVarying initial doses of activated eptacog beta (recombinant human FVIIa, rhFVIIa) may provide therapeutic options when treating bleeding in patients with congenital haemophilia who have developed inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX). This study evaluated escalated doses of a new rhFVIIa product as a prelude to selecting the doses for clinical efficacy evaluation in haemophilia patients. AimTo assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and laboratory pharmacodynamics of 3 doses of rhFVIIa in non-bleeding patients with congenital haemophilia A or B with or without inhibitors. MethodsAdult male patients (18-75years old) with congenital haemophilia A or B (with or without inhibitors) received infusions of rhFVIIa at doses of 25, 75 or 225g/kg body weight. Ten patients were treated at each dose level, and each patient received 2 different dose levels. Descriptive methods were used to analyse the data. ResultsAdministration of rhFVIIa at all doses was well tolerated. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed that peak FVIIa plasma levels (C-max) were approximately proportional to dose and correlated well with peak thrombin generation. Total AUC(0-inf) also was approximately dose proportional. Clot formation and duration correlated with FVIIa activity. Repeat doses did not produce an immunological response. ConclusionIn the first dose-escalation study of rhFVIIa to support product registration, eptacog beta at doses of 25, 75, and 225g/kg was pharmacodynamically active and well tolerated in non-bleeding patients with congenital haemophilia A or B.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据