4.3 Article

Somatosensory profile of patients with haemophilia

期刊

HAEMOPHILIA
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 97-103

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hae.13370

关键词

haemophilia; haemophilic arthropathy; knee joint; pain; Quantitative Sensory Testing; somatosensory profile; synovitis

资金

  1. Clinical Research Program of the World Federation of Hemophilia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IntroductionPatients with haemophilia (PwH) suffer from an enhanced pain sensitivity due to repetitive joint bleedings. A comprehensive, quantitative examination of the somatosensory system has not been performed in this population to date. Material and methodsThirty patients with moderate or severe haemophilia A or B and 30 healthy controls were examined by means of Quantitative Sensory Testing to assess the function of the somatosensory system. Detection (DT) and pain thresholds (PT) were determined, amounting to a total of 13 parameters. Both knee joints and the hand as reference were examined in order to assess both joint-specific as well as general changes in the somatosensory profile. ResultsAnalysing DT and PT, a significant main effect was found for groupxstimulus interaction (P.001). Post hoc tests revealed significant differences in DT between PwH and controls for thermal stimuli across both knees (cold DT: P<.001; warm DT: P<.01) and the hand (cold DT: P<.01; warm DT: P<.05). Mechanical DT was increased in PwH at both knee joints (left knee: P.05; right knee: P.01). Furthermore, pressure PT was decreased in PwH at both knees (P.001). ConclusionHaemophilic arthropathy leads to alterations of the somatosensory profile in PwH. Our results reveal initial evidence of a combination of peripheral sensitization, indicated by decreased pressure PT and mechanical DT at the knee joints, as well as general changes of the somatosensory system, shown by reduced thermal DT at affected sites and remote from these. Therefore, both mechanisms have to be considered regarding the pain management in PwH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据