4.3 Review

The association between the environmental endocrine disruptor bisphenol A and polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 370-377

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1405931

关键词

Bisphenol A (BPA); polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS); systematic review; meta-analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation for Youth (China) [21507094]
  2. Clinical Research Fund of Sichuan University West China Second University Hospital [KL008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the association between bisphenol A (BPA) and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis using STATA software for observational studies.Results: Nine studies involving 493 PCOS patients and 440 controls were included in this review. The meta-analysis demonstrated that PCOS patients had significantly higher BPA levels compared with control groups (standardized mean difference (SMD): 2.437, 95% confidence interval (CI): (1.265, 3.609), p<.001). For studies of serum samples detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), subgroup analyses according to ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), sample size, detection method (high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and ELISA), PCOS-to-control ratio and study quality displayed that high BPA levels were significantly associated with Caucasian PCOS patients (SMD: 0.615, 95% CI: (0.308, 0.922), p<.001), high BMI (SMD: 0.512, 95% CI: (0.180, 0.843), p=.002), high quality (SMD: 0.624, 95% CI: (0.391, 0.856), p<.001), and high HOMA-IR (SMD: 0.467, 95% CI: (0.121, 0.813), p=.008).Conclusions: Serum BPA may be positively associated with women with PCOS and BPA might be involved in the insulin-resistance and hyperandrogenism of PCOS. More evidence from high quality studies, advanced detection methods, and larger cohorts for observational trials are needed to further confirm the association between BPA and PCOS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据