4.1 Review

The Assessment of Convalescent Plasma Efficacy against COVID-19

期刊

MED
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 66-77

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2020.11.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [AI052733, AI15207, HL059842, R01AI123654, R01AI143453, DK111930]
  2. Mathers Foundation
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) [3UL1TR002556-04S1]
  4. BARDA [75A50120C00096]
  5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [5R35HL139854]
  6. The Longer Life Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibody-based therapy for infectious diseases predates modern antibiotics and, in the absence of other therapeutic options, was deployed early in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic through COVID-1 9 convalescent plasma (CCP) administration. Although most studies have demonstrated signals of efficacy for CCP, definitive assessment has proved difficult under pandemic conditions, with rapid changes in disease incidence and the knowledge base complicating the design and implementation of randomized controlled trials. Nevertheless, evidence from a variety of studies demonstrates that CCP is as safe as ordinary plasma and strongly suggests that it can reduce mortality if given early and with sufficient antibody content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据