4.3 Article

Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection for Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors Originating from the Muscularis Propria Layer: A Single-Center Study

期刊

GUT AND LIVER
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 620-627

出版社

EDITORIAL OFFICE GUT & LIVER
DOI: 10.5009/gnl15424

关键词

Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection; Submucosal tumor; Upper gastrointestinal; Treatment outcome

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81101610]
  2. Scientific Research Projects of Guangdong Province [2013B021800311]
  3. Medical Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [WSTJJ201111014209219211976091 3465X]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: In recent years, endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) has gained popularity worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESTD in treating upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs) in a large-volume endoscopic center. Methods: Patients with SMTs were enrolled in this study between January 2012 and January 2015. Demographic data, clinical data, and treatment outcome were collected and analyzed. Results: Seventy SMTs originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer were identified in 69 patients. All patients successfully underwent the ESTD procedure. The mean procedure time was 49.0 +/- 29.5 minutes, and the mean tumor size was 18.7 +/- 7.2 mm. Among all lesions, the majority (70.0%) were located in the esophagus, 12.9% in the cardia, and 17.1% in the stomach. Complete resection was achieved in 67 lesions (95.7%). Perforation occurred in three patients (4.3%), who were treated by endoclips. Pneumothorax occurred in two patients (2.9%) and was successfully managed by thoracic drainage. During a median follow-up of 18.1 months, patients were free of local recurrence or distant metastasis. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated the feasibility and safety of ESTD in treating upper gastrointestinal SMTs originating from the MP layer. Large-scale comparative studies with other treatment methods should be conducted in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据