4.8 Article

A PEGylated deep eutectic solvent for controllable solvothermal synthesis of porous NiCo2S4 for efficient oxygen evolution reaction

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 19, 期 13, 页码 3023-3031

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7gc01012e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21473252, 21575160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As ionic liquid analogues or quasi-ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents (DESs) have been applied in many fields in the past few years. Herein, a novel PEGylated DES composed of PEG 200 and thiourea was formed for the first time and used for solvothermal synthesis of nickel cobalt sulfides. The structure and composition of the as-synthesized sulfides can be tuned by adjustment of the ratio of the reactants. The PEGylated DES plays multiple roles as a solvent, a shape-control agent, and a sulfur source in the synthesis of sulfides. Compared with traditional sulfuration routes, this proposed route is cost-effective and energy-efficient by combining solvothermal synthesis and the sulfuration process. The prepared sulfides were used as catalysts for electrochemical water oxidation and they exhibited excellent oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance, especially for NiCo2S4 with hierarchical pores. The overpotential (eta) demand was 337 mV for the current density reaching 10 mA cm(-2) and the Tafel slope was 64 mV dec(-1) in an alkaline medium (1 M KOH) for NiCo2S4. In addition, NiCo2S4 demonstrated long-term stability with little deactivation after either thirty hours of continuous operation or two thousand cycles and a high faradaic efficiency of 95.8%. Synergistic effects including a relatively high Brunauer-Emmett-Teller area, abundant active sites, easy diffusion of electrolytes and oxygen gas, and strong structural integrity contribute to the high activity and long-term stability of the catalyst for OER. This study provides a new method for the synthesis of hierarchically structured metal sulfides for energy conversion and storage applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据