4.8 Article

Molybdenum modified nickel phyllosilicates as a high performance bifunctional catalyst for deoxygenation of methyl palmitate to alkanes under mild conditions

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 19, 期 19, 页码 4600-4609

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7gc01720k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21325208, 21572212]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2017YFA0303500]
  3. Chinese Academy of Science [XDB20000000]
  4. Key Technologies R&D Programme of Anhui Province [1604a0702027]
  5. FRFCU
  6. PCSIRT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deoxygenation is the central challenge in converting bio-derived fatty esters into diesel-range hydrocarbons. A new molybdenum oxide doping nickel phyllosilicate (Mo-Ni@PSi) bifunctional catalyst was synthesized and used for the deoxygenation of methyl palmitate. Compared to impregnated Ni catalysts, Mo-Ni@PSi catalysts showed obviously enhanced catalytic activity for the deoxygenation process. Several structural variations induced by the introduction of Mo species were confirmed by H-2-TPR, XRD, FT-IR, TEM, XPS, and NH3-TPD characterization. With these variations, more dispersive Ni nanoparticles (Ni NPs) and acidic sites were explored over the surface of modified Mo-Ni@PSi, which provided high catalytic activity for the deoxygenation of fatty esters. Furthermore, the content of the Mo element and the influences of activation temperature on the catalyst were also investigated. Remarkably, the highest catalytic activity was observed over the 3% Mo-Ni@PSi(B) catalyst with 98.3% yield of hydrocarbons at 220 degrees C and 1.0 MPa H-2, and the catalytic activity decreased with further increase in the Mo content. Then, hydrodeoxygenation and decarbonylation processes were both confirmed in the reaction mechanism study. Additionally, the catalyst also presented good catalytic activity after four recycle reactions. The oxidization of reduced Ni and Mo species was probably the main reason for the deactivation of the catalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据