4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Rigidity controllable as-rigid-as-possible shape deformation

期刊

GRAPHICAL MODELS
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 13-21

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.gmod.2017.02.005

关键词

Shape deformation; Rigidity; Neighborhood; Geometric modeling; As rigid as possible

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61502453, 61611130215]
  2. Royal Society-Newton Mobility Grant [IE150731]
  3. CCF-Tencent Open Research Fund [AGR20160118]
  4. Institute of Computing Technology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [ICT20166040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shape deformation is one of the fundamental techniques in geometric processing. One principle of deformation is to preserve the geometric details while distributing the necessary distortions uniformly. To achieve this, state-of-the-art techniques deform shapes in a locally as-rigid-as-possible (ARAP) manner. Existing ARAP deformation methods optimize rigid transformations in the 1-ring neighborhoods and maintain the consistency between adjacent pairs of rigid transformations by single overlapping edges. In this paper, we make one step further and propose to use larger local neighborhoods to enhance the consistency of adjacent rigid transformations. This is helpful to keep the geometric details better and distribute the distortions more uniformly. Moreover, the size of the expanded local neighborhoods provides an intuitive parameter to adjust physical stiffness. The larger the neighborhood is, the more rigid the material is. Based on these, we propose a novel rigidity controllable mesh deformation method where shape rigidity can be flexibly adjusted. The size of the local neighborhoods can be learned from datasets of deforming objects automatically or specified by the user, and may vary over the surface to simulate shapes composed of mixed materials. Various examples are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据