4.7 Article

Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: Towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004

关键词

Cross-study comparison; Ecosystem services; French Alps; Land use; Social-ecological systems; Trade-off; Natural capital; Biodiversity

资金

  1. A University of Southampton IfLS Research Stimulus Fund
  2. ERC Starting Grant 'SCALEFORES' [680176]
  3. CEH project [NEC05264]
  4. OPERAs [FP7-ENV-2012-two-stage-308393]
  5. ESPA Early Career Fellowship Grant [FELL-2014-104]
  6. Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) programme
  7. Department for International Development (DFID)
  8. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  9. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  10. ERC Grant 'GLOLAND' [311819]
  11. US National Science Foundation [DEB-1038759, DEB-1440485, DEB-1440297]
  12. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN 327077-2013]
  13. NSERC EWR Steacie Fellowship
  14. Social-ecological dynamics of ecosystem services in the Norrstrom basin (SEEN) project - Swedish Research Council Formas [2012-1058]
  15. Swedish Research Council MISTRA
  16. European Research Council (ERC) [680176, 311819] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple ecosystem services (ES) can respond similarly to social and ecological factors to form bundles. Identifying key social-ecological variables and understanding how they co-vary to produce these consistent sets of ES may ultimately allow the prediction and modelling of ES bundles, and thus, help us understand critical synergies and trade-offs across landscapes. Such an understanding is essential for informing better management of multi-functional landscapes and minimising costly trade-offs. However, the relative importance of different social and biophysiCal drivers of ES bundles in different types of social-ecological systems remains unclear. As such, a bottom-up understanding of the determinants of ES bundles is a critical research gap in ES and sustainability science. Here, we evaluate the current methods used in ES bundle science and synthesize these into four steps that capture the plurality of methods used to examine predictors of ES bundles. We then apply these four steps to a cross-study comparison (North and South French Alps) of relationships between social-ecological variables and ES bundles, as it is widely advocated that cross-study comparisons are necessary for achieving a general understanding of predictors of ES associations. We use the results of this case study to assess the strengths and limitations of current approaches for understanding distributions of ES bundles. We conclude that inconsistency of spatial scale remains the primary barrier for understanding and predicting ES bundles. We suggest a hypothesis-driven approach is required to predict relationships between ES, and we outline the research required for such an understanding to emerge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据