4.0 Review

Possible implications of animal models for the assessment of visceral pain

期刊

ANIMAL MODELS AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 215-228

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ame2.12130

关键词

animal model; inflammation; noxious stimuli; traction; visceral pain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute pain, provoked generally after the activation of peripheral nociceptors, is an adaptive sensory function that alerts the individual to avoid noxious stimuli. However, uncontrolled acute pain has a maladaptive role in sensory activity leading to development of a chronic pain state which persists even after the damage is resolved, or in some cases, in the absence of an initial local acute injury. Huge numbers of people suffer from visceral pain at least once during their life span, leading to substantial health care costs. Although studies reporting on the mechanism of visceral pain are accumulating, it is still not precisely understood. Therefore, this review aims to elucidate the mechanism of visceral pain through an evaluation of different animal models and their application to develop novel therapeutic approaches for treating visceral pain. To assess the nociceptive responses in viscera, several visceral pain models such as inflammatory, traction, stress and genetic models utilizing different methods of measurement have been devised. Among them, the inflammatory and traction models are widely used for studying the visceral pain mechanism of different disease conditions and post-operative surgery in humans and animals. A hapten, 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS), has been extensively used as an inflammatory agent to induce visceral pain. The traction model seems to cause a strong pain stimulation and autonomic reaction and could thus be the most appropriate model for studying the underlying visceral pain mechanism and for probing the therapeutic efficacies of various anesthetic and analgesics for the treatment of visceral pain and hyperalgesia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据