4.7 Article

GTB-PPI: Predict Protein-protein Interactions Based on L1-regularized Logistic Regression and Gradient Tree Boosting

期刊

GENOMICS PROTEOMICS & BIOINFORMATICS
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 582-592

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2021.01.001

关键词

Protein-protein interaction; Feature fusion; L1-regularized logistic regression; Gradient tree boosting; Machine learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61863010]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province of China [2019GGX101001]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China [ZR2018MC007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are of great importance to understand genetic mechanisms, delineate disease pathogenesis, and guide drug design. With the increase of PPI data and development of machine learning technologies, prediction and identification of PPIs have become a research hotspot in proteomics. In this study, we propose a new prediction pipeline for PPIs based on gradient tree boosting (GTB). First, the initial feature vector is extracted by fusing pseudo amino acid composition (PseAAC), pseudo position-specific scoring matrix (PsePSSM), reduced sequence and index-vectors (RSIV), and autocorrelation descriptor (AD). Second, to remove redundancy and noise, we employ L1-regularized logistic regression (L1-RLR) to select an optimal feature subset. Finally, GTB-PPI model is constructed. Five-fold cross-validation showed that GTB-PPI achieved the accuracies of 95.15% and 90.47% on Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Helicobacter pylori datasets, respectively. In addition, GTB-PPI could be applied to predict the independent test datasets for Caenorhabditis elegans, Escherichia coli, Homo sapiens, and Mus musculus, the one-core PPI network for CD9, and the crossover PPI network for the Wnt-related signaling pathways. The results show that GTB-PPI can significantly improve accuracy of PPI prediction. The code and datasets of GTB-PPI can be downloaded from https://github.com/QUST-AIBBDRC/GTB-PPI/.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据