4.1 Article

Anticholinergic burden and dry mouth among Finnish, community-dwelling older adults

期刊

GERODONTOLOGY
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 3-10

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ger.12304

关键词

aged; anticholinergic burden; anticholinergic drug scale; anticholinergic drugs; dry mouth; hyposalivation; xerostomia

资金

  1. Social Insurance Institute
  2. City of Kuopio
  3. Finnish Dental Society Apollonia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveThe aim was to study whether the anticholinergic burden of drugs is related to xerostomia and salivary secretion among community-dwelling elderly people. BackgroundAnticholinergic drugs have been shown to be a risk factor for dry mouth, but little is known about the effects of cumulative exposure to anticholinergic drugs measured by anticholinergic burden on salivary secretion or xerostomia. MethodsThe study population consisted of 152 community-dwelling, dentate, non-smoking, older people from the Oral Health GeMS study. The data were collected by interviews and clinical examinations. Anticholinergic burden was determined using the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS). A Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used to estimate relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI 95%). ResultsParticipants with a high-anticholinergic burden (ADS3) were more likely to have xerostomia (RR: 3.17; CI: 1.44-6.96), low-unstimulated salivary flow (<0.1mL/min; RR: 2.31, CI: 1.22-4.43) and low-stimulated salivary flow (<1.0mL/min; RR: 1.50, CI: 0.80-2.81) compared to reference group (ADS 0). In participants with a moderate anticholinergic burden (ADS 1-2), all the risk estimates for xerostomia, unstimulated and stimulated salivary secretion varied between 0.55 and 3.13. Additional adjustment for the total number of drugs, antihypertensives and sedative load caused only slight attenuation of the risk estimates. ConclusionA high-anticholinergic burden was associated with low-unstimulated salivary secretion and xerostomia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据