4.6 Article

Two effective methods for calculating water saturations in shale-gas reservoirs

期刊

GEOPHYSICS
卷 82, 期 3, 页码 D187-D197

出版社

SOC EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICISTS
DOI: 10.1190/GEO2016-0462.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41302107]
  2. Ministry of Land and Resources special funds for scientific research on public cause [201311107]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2652011282]
  4. CNPC Innovation Foundation [2012D-5006-0103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water saturation is one of the most important parameters in petroleum exploration and development. However, its calculation has been limited by the insufficient logging data required by a new technique that further influences the calculation of the free gas content. The accuracy of water saturation estimates is also a critical issue because it controls whether or not we can obtain an accurate gas saturation estimate. Organic matter plays an important role in shale-gas reservoirs, and the total organic carbon (TOC) indirectly controls the gas content and gas saturation. Hence, water saturation is influenced by inorganic and organic components. After analyzing the relationship among TOC, core water saturation, and conventional gas saturation, considering the influence of TOC on gas saturation in organic-rich shale reservoirs, we developed two new methods to improve the accuracy of water saturation estimates: the revised water saturation-TOC method and the water saturation separation method, in which Archie water saturation, modified total shale water saturation, and TOC are integrated. According to case studies of Longmaxi-Wufeng shale, southeastern Sichuan Basin, China, the water saturation results from these two methods in shale reservoirs with different lithologies are consistent with those from core analysis. We concluded that these two methods can be evaluated quickly and they effectively evaluate the water saturation of shale reservoirs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据