4.7 Article

Seismotectonics of the 2013 Lushan Mw 6.7 earthquake: Inversion tectonics in the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 44, 期 16, 页码 8236-8243

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017GL074296

关键词

blind fault; reactivated fault; seismotectonics; shear fault-bend folding; inversion tectonics; Lushan earthquake

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41202142, 41430316, 41572117]
  2. Project for Sichuan-Yunnan National Earthquake Experimental Field [2017CESE0102]
  3. Project for Basic Research Work of the Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration [IGCEA1422]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

On 20 April 2013, an unexpected M-w 6.7 earthquake occurred in Lushan County at the southern Longmen Shan, the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. A high-resolution seismic reflection profile was combined with near-surface geological data, earthquake relocation and geodetic measurements, and a recent deep artificial seismic reflection profile to identify the active fault and seismotectonics of this earthquake. Three-dimensional imaging of the aftershocks was used to identify two planar faults that together form a y shape (f1 and f2). Seismic interpretations suggest that fault f1 did not break through the overlying Mesozoic and Cenozoic rocks and is a typical blind fault. Geodetic measurements suggest that the coseismic deformation is consistent with the geometry and kinematics of shear fault-bend folding. Deep seismic data indicate the syndepositional nature of fault f1 a preexisting normal fault older than the Triassic, which underwent positive inversion tectonics during the Late Cenozoic. A thrust fault f3 converges with f1 at a depth of approximately 12km with an accumulated slip 3.6km. This 2013 Lushan earthquake triggered by blind faults is a hidden earthquake. Blind and reactivated faults increase the potential risk and uncertainty related to earthquakes in the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据