4.7 Article

The influence of the Calbuco eruption on the 2015 Antarctic ozone hole in a fully coupled chemistry-climate model

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 2556-2561

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016GL071925

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Atmospheric Chemistry [AGS-1539972]
  2. NSF [1338814, 1539972]
  3. University of Leeds
  4. NCAR
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/N006038/1]
  6. National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS)
  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  8. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/N006038/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. NERC [NE/N006038/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  11. Directorate For Geosciences [1539972] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  13. Directorate For Geosciences [1338814] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent research has demonstrated that the concentrations of anthropogenic halocarbons have decreased in response to the worldwide phaseout of ozone depleting substances. Yet in 2015 the Antarctic ozone hole reached a historical record daily average size in October. Model simulations with specified dynamics and temperatures based on a reanalysis suggested that the record size was likely due to the eruption of Calbuco but did not allow for fully coupled dynamical or thermal feedbacks. We present simulations of the impact of the 2015 Calbuco eruption on the stratosphere using the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model with interactive dynamics and temperatures. Comparisons of the interactive and specified dynamics simulations indicate that chemical ozone depletion due to volcanic aerosols played a key role in establishing the record-sized ozone hole of October 2015. The analysis of an ensemble of interactive simulations with and without volcanic aerosols suggests that the forced response to the eruption of Calbuco was an increase in the size of the ozone hole by 4.5x10(6)km(2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据