3.8 Proceedings Paper

On Virtual Id Assignment in Networks for High Resilience Routing: A Theoretical Framework

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9322538

关键词

Virtual Id; laplacian; recursive bipartition

资金

  1. US NSF [CNS-1618339, CNS-1617729, CNS-1814322, CNS-1836772]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, the effort of promoting versatile, easy to manage routing schemes, as a replacement to OSPF has gathered momentum particularly in the context of large-scale enterprise networks, data center networks and software-defined wide area networks (SD-WANs). Such routing schemes rely on embedding the network into a geometric/topological space (e.g. a binary tree) to facilitate multi-path routing with reduced state maintenance and quick recovery in localized failure scenarios. In this work, we propose a systematic framework to embed the network topology into a hierarchical binary virtual-identity-space that is particularly amenable to multi-path routing. Our methodology firstly involves a relaxed form of the connected graph bi-partitioning problem that exploits a geometric embedding of the network in an n-dimensional Euclidean space (n being the number of hosts in the network) based on the Moore-Penrose pseudo inverse of the Laplacian for the graph associated with the network. The edges of the network are mapped to a weight distribution that helps construct a spanning tree from the core of the network towards the periphery, thereby providing a point of symmetry in the network to facilitate balanced bipartitions. This, in turn, yields a (nearly) full balanced binary tree embedding of the network and consequently a good virtual-id space. We also explore the binary identity assignment problem in another point of view by using bi-connected graph as the input graph to introduce a recursive bipartition algorithm. Through rigorous theoretical analysis and experimentation, we demonstrate that our methods perform well within reasonable bounds of computational complexity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据