4.6 Article

Migration and cutoff of meanders in the hyperarid environment of the middle Tarim River, northwestern China

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 276, 期 -, 页码 116-124

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.10.018

关键词

Dryland river; Meandering channel; Lateral migration; Cutoff

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41571009, 91547112, 91547113, 51309102]
  3. National Key R & D Plan of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2016YFC0401401, 2016YFC0402502]
  4. Research Foundation of the Education Department of Hunan Province of China [16B010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A meandering channel has developed in the middle Tarim River, the longest inland river flowing through a hyper arid environment in northwestern China. Although the drainage basin of the Tarim River extends over 1 million km(2), flow in downstream reaches is largely restricted to summer months, and irrigation pressures have made the flood season increasingly short. The planform morphology, lateral migration rate, and cutoffs of 105 meanders were analysed using multiperiod remote sensing images and field survey analyses of channel bed and bank properties and of riparian vegetation cover. Results show that planform attributes of the meandering Tarim River are similar to those found in other environments. The ratio of the channel centreline length to the neck channel width of meanders ranges between 12 and 8.1, the bend curvature (ratio of bend radius to channel width) ranges between 0.30 and 2.8, and the average deflection angle of the bend apexes is 79.9. Meander migration rates range from 1.4 to 96.7 m y(-1). From 2000 to 2013, 45 cutoffs occurred along the 400-km-long reach. As the riparian vegetation cover is sparse because of limited precipitation and because banks are comprised of dense roots, fine sand and silt materials, but lack clay, bank strength is limited and presents limited constraints upon bend movement. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据