3.8 Proceedings Paper

Transfer Learning for Wildfire Identification in UAV Imagery

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/CISS48834.2020.1570617429

关键词

Wildfire detection; deep learning; CNN for mobile device; unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1755984]
  2. Arizona Board of Regents (ABOR) [1003330]
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1755984] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to Wildfire's huge destructive impacts on agriculture and food production, wildlife habitat, climate, human life and ecosystem, timely discovery of fires enable swift response to fires before they go out of control, in order to minimize the resulting damage and impacts. One of the emerging technologies for fire monitoring is deploying Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, due to their high flexibility and maneuverability, less human risk, and on-demand high quality imaging capabilities. In order to realize a real-time system for fire detection and expansion analysis, fast and high-accuracy image-processing algorithms are required. Several studies have shown that deep learning methods can provide the most accurate response, however the training time can be prohibitively long, especially when using online learning for constant refinement of the developed model. Another challenge is the lack of large datasets for training a deep learning algorithm. In this respect, we propose to use a pre-trained mobileNetV2 architecture to implement transfer learning, which requires a smaller dataset and reduces the computational complexity while not compromising the accuracy. In addition, we conduct an effective data augmentation pipeline to simulate some extreme scenarios, which could promise the robustness of our approach. The testing results illustrate that our method maintains a high identification accuracy in different situations - original dataset (99.7%), adding Gaussian blurred (953 %), and additive Gaussian noise (99.3 %)(1-2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据