4.3 Article

Composition Shifts of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi between Natural Wetland and Cultivated Paddy Field

期刊

GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 34, 期 10, 页码 834-839

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01490451.2017.1280861

关键词

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF); high-throughput sequencing; paddy field; wetland; wild rice

资金

  1. Science Foundation of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB15030103]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31370144, 41571255]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0501202]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province [20140101017JC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The community assembly change of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) during the reclamation of wetlands to paddy fields is mostly unknown. In this study, we applied the high-throughput sequencing technique to investigate the composition of the AMF community in natural wetland (common wild rice and Leersia hexandra Swartz) and paddy field (Asian cultivated rice), as well as the soil elements effective on the community of AMF. Soil properties including soil organic carbon, available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), available potassium, and pH were also measured. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of nine genera in four orders (Glomerales, Diversisporales, Archaeosporales, and Paraglomerales) of AMF were detected. All detected AMF genera were found in the wild rice wetland, while about half of the detected AMF genera were absent in paddy field; however, the absolute amount of total AMF in the paddy field and wetland was not different. Among all measured soil properties, AMF community was affected significantly by soil AN and AP. Results indicate that agricultural managements affect AMF community significantly, but do not have negative effects on the absolute amount of all the AMF genera. Soil AP may be the main factor resulting in the decreased AMF genus in paddy field. In addition, AMF may have contributed to the survival and evolution of plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据