4.3 Article

Isolation and Characterization of Rumex acetosa-Associated Mineral-Weathering Bacteria

期刊

GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 148-155

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01490451.2017.1338800

关键词

Biotite; mineral-weathering effectiveness and pattern; Rumex acetosa-associated weathering bacteria; weathering mechanism

资金

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [41473075, 41501257]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A total of 121 bacterial strains were isolated from the rhizosphere soils, root and stem interiors of Rumex acetosa to characterize the microenvironment-related changes in the mineral-weathering effectiveness, weathering mechanisms and populations of the bacteria. Among the 121 bacterial strains, 118 bacterial strains were found to weather biotite. The relative abundance of the highly effective mineral-weathering bacteria was different among the rhizosphere soils, root and stem interiors. Notably, the highest and lowest relative abundances of the highly effective mineral-weathering bacteria were observed in the stem and root interiors, respectively. Furthermore, the relative abundance of the highly acid-producing bacteria was significantly higher in the rhizosphere soils and stem interiors, while the highest and lowest relative abundances of the highly siderophore-producing bacteria were found in the stem interiors and rhizosphere soils, respectively. The mineral-weathering bacteria from the rhizosphere soils, root and stem interiors were affiliated with 11, 7 and 4 genera, respectively. In addition, 25-73% of the bacterial genera were specific to the plant-associated environments. The results showed diverse mineral-weathering bacteria in the plant-associated environments and microenvironment-related changes in weathering effectiveness and pattern and populations of the mineral-weathering bacteria. The results also suggested the different biotite-weathering mechanisms used by the bacteria among the plant-associated environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据