4.7 Article

Zircon Hf-O isotope evidence for recycled oceanic and continental crust in the sources of alkaline rocks

期刊

GEOLOGY
卷 45, 期 5, 页码 407-410

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G38872.1

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of People's Republic of China [2016YFC0600109]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41521062, 41688103]
  3. Hundred Talent and Ten Thousands Talent Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Post-orogenic and intraplate extensional alkaline rocks are believed to have formed by partial melting of metasomatized ultramafic rocks in the subcontinental lithospheric mantle. Their variable incompatible element abundances and radiogenic isotopic ratios reflect recycling of subducted oceanic or continental crustal material into their source reservoirs. However, whole-rock geochemical and Sr-Nd isotopic data do not well constrain the nature of this recycled crustal material because of complex petrogenetic processes, i.e., crustal assimilation, fractional crystallization, magma mixing, and post-magmatic alteration. Here we present an integrated study of in situ Hf-O isotopes in zircons from two Triassic alkaline complexes in the northeastern Sino-Korean craton, i.e., the Hekanzi and Saima alkaline complexes. The Hekanzi alkaline rocks have zircon epsilon(Hf) (t) values of -2.5 to +0.6 and sub-normal mantle delta O-18 (+3.8% to +5.4%), indicating a component of high-temperature altered oceanic crust involved in their mantle source prior to magma generation. In contrast, the Saima alkaline rocks have extremely negative zircon epsilon(Hf) (t) (-11 to -14) and elevated delta O-18 (+7.1% to +8.4%) values, suggesting continental crust recycled into their mantle source prior to magma generation. Our results show that the combined zircon Hf and O isotopes are powerful tracers to distinguish recycled continental crust from recycled oceanic crust and, importantly, provide compelling evidence for recycled continental crust in the sources of alkaline rocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据