4.4 Article

Organic-walled microfossils from the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary stratotype section, Chapel Island and Random formations, Burin Peninsula, Newfoundland, Canada: Global correlation and significance for the evolution of early complex ecosystems

期刊

GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL
卷 53, 期 5, 页码 1728-1742

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gj.2998

关键词

acritarchs; Cambrian; Ediacaran; GSSP; Newfoundland; small carbonaceous fossils

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CGL 2012-37237, CGL-2008-0473]
  2. Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although a variety of trace and body fossils have been described from the Cambrian strata in the stratotype section (global stratotype section and point) of the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary in the Burin Peninsula, Newfoundland, a detailed analysis of its organic-walled microfossils has been missing. The basal Cambrian Treptichnus pedum Ichnozone of the Chapel Island Formation is dominated by leiosphaerids and filamentous sheaths. The appearance of Granomarginata approximates the base of the overlying Rusophycus avalonensis Ichnozone. Common process-bearing acritarchs, represented by small Asteridium and Comasphaeridium, first appear in the middle of the overlying Random Formation, and a more diverse acritarch assemblage at its top. The Random Formation also yields small carbonaceous metazoan fossils, the first report of this type of fossil in this formation. The initial low diversity of phytoplankton in the basal Cambrian strata, a holdover from Ediacaran extinctions, indicated that they have limited potential for precise global correlation of the global stratotype section and point. The pattern of increasing diversity of acritarchs through the lower Fortunian strata lagged behind and was potentially a response to the Cambrian radiation of metazoans, as most clearly represented by ichnofossils. The timing of phytoplankton radiation reflects a dynamic lag driven by metazoan-induced changes in early Cambrian food webs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据