4.5 Review

A Newcomer's Guide to Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy Experiments

期刊

IEEE REVIEWS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 292-308

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2019.2944351

关键词

Functional near infrared spectroscopy; fNIRS; neuroimaging

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1565962, 1539068]
  2. German Research Foundations Cluster of Excellence Brainlinks-Braintools [EXC 1086]
  3. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1565962] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review presents a practical primer for functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) with respect to technology, experimentation, and analysis software. Its purpose is to jump-start interested practitioners considering utilizing a non-invasive, versatile, nevertheless challenging window into the brain using optical methods. We briefly recapitulate relevant anatomical and optical foundations and give a short historical overview. We describe competing types of illumination (trans-illumination, reflectance, and differential reflectance) and data collection methods (continuous wave, time domain and frequency domain). Basic components (light sources, detection, and recording components) of fNIRS systems are presented. Advantages and limitations of fNIRS techniques are offered, followed by a list of very practical recommendations for its use. A variety of experimental and clinical studies with fNIRS are sampled, shedding light on many brain-related ailments. Finally, we describe and discuss a number of freely available analysis and presentation packages suited for data analysis. In conclusion, we recommend fNIRS due to its ever-growing body of clinical applications, state-of-the-art neuroimaging technique and manageable hardware requirements. It can be safely concluded that fNIRS adds a new arrow to the quiver of neuro-medical examinations due to both its great versatility and limited costs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据