3.9 Article

Investigating cost overruns and delay in urban construction projects in Iran

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1601394

关键词

Urban construction project; delay; cost overruns; developing countries; Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the cost and time performance of urban construction projects in Iran, with a focus on different scales and natures of projects. It finds that large projects face more significant cost overruns and delays, new-build projects perform better than renovation projects, and urban road projects have better cost performance than building projects. The findings provide valuable information for realistic time and cost estimation in urban construction projects.
Urban construction, as one of the most important sectors of construction industry in Iran, commonly faces significant cost overruns and delay. The main objective of this study is to evaluate how small, medium and large urban construction projects perform in terms of cost and time. Moreover, different types (road or building) and nature (new or renovation) of construction projects are considered in this research. This study looks at the urban construction projects in Karaj, the capital of Alborz Province, Iran. In this study, 72 urban construction projects are surveyed by reviewing their documents and their real performance. To analyze the collected data, the statistical analyses including class range analysis, independent-sample T-test and correlation analysis are used. This study shows that large urban construction projects are faced higher cost overruns and delay. Moreover, the time- and cost-performance of the new-build projects in overall is better than renovation projects. Furthermore, the cost-performance of urban road projects is better than building projects. The findings offer descriptive statistical cost and time performance information to support realistic time and cost estimation in urban construction projects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据