4.7 Article

SMOS data as a source of the agricultural drought information: Case study of the Vistula catchment, Poland

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 306, 期 -, 页码 167-182

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.018

关键词

Drought monitoring; SPEI; SMI; SMIm; SMOS; Vistula

资金

  1. Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Building Services, Hydro and Environmental Engineering Dean's Grant [504/02638/1110/42.000100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

So far numerous drought indices have been developed to quantitatively describe the drought phenomenon. Most of the commonly used indices apply diverse meteorological information, and use nontrivial modeling schemes. Relatively smaller number of drought indices uses information about soil moisture (SM) content that is directly related to water available for the plants. This could be explained by the limitations associated with high costs of the in-situ SM measurements especially when they are carried out over large areas. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that SMOS satellite mission is an important source of information not about SM only, but also about agricultural drought conditions on a regional scale. To do so, we compared over the Vistula river catchment, Soil Moisture Index (SMI) calculated using original formula and exclusively SMOS data with more complicated and computationally demanding Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPED. Our analysis involved almost a four-year period 2010-2014. We also proposed new Modified Soil Moisture Index (SMIm) to be useful specifically for SMOS data application. It was shown, that spatial distributions of SMI and particularly those of SMIm, calculated using only SMOS SM data, reveal many details about drought conditions, often more than spatial distributions of SPEI. In particular, comparisons made for a severe drought which occurred in Poland in 2013, revealed that SMI and SMIm are suitable to assess agricultural drought risk. Thus our results show that SMIm could be a cheap supplementary tool for drought monitoring in large areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据